Winter
2003
This information
effective for Winter 2003. Check with instructor the first day of class
for any changes.
Philosophy
9.
Introduction to Logic
Instructor:
S. Chung
Course
Description:
Logic
is the study of arguments, and one aim of this course is to give students
the tools necessary to assess the correctness of arguments. An argument
is a collection of premises that are supposed to support or give reasons
for accepting the conclusion of the argument. An argument is logically
correct if the premises support the conclusion, and an argument is logically
incorrect if the premises do not provide support for the conclusion. We
will be primarily interested in developing the ability to distinguish
logically correct from logically incorrect arguments. In order to do this,
we will study both the science of logic, and how this science is to be
applied in determining whether arguments are logically correct or not.
Along with
the science of logic and its application, we will also discuss philosophical
problems of logic as they arise. Even though the science of logic is well
developed, there are many unsolved problems in the philosophy of logic.
As the logic necessary for understanding these problems is learned, some
of the philosophical problems will be introduced.
This course
is a beginning course in logic, and there are no prerequisites.
Evaluations
will be based upon exams, homework, and class participation.
[top
of page]
21.
Wilderness Studies
MW
5:00 p.m.6:45 p.m.
Stevenson 150
Call No. 38744
Instructor: J. Doris
Course
Description:
The
North American land mass, like other places around the globe, has far
fewer wild places, and far fewer wild things, than it did even one hundred
years ago. Philosophy 21, Wilderness Studies, is in the business of asking
what this means, and what should be done about it. Perhaps Edward Abbey
overstated things when he wrote that if the "psychiatric refuge"
of the wilderness is gone, "the madness becomes universal."
Perhaps not. I agree with Abbey that the wilderness issueand the
issue of wilderness desecrationis not, at bottom, a technological
or scientific issue, but an ethical orand I use the word without
apologya spiritual issue. Our relationship with those few placesin
the land and in our heartsthat remain wild involves, like other
relationships, as many questions of feeling as questions of doing and
believing. It is these questions that the class, which will be primarily
based in group discussion, will be trying to answer.
[top
of page]
80G.
Bioethics in the 21st Century: Science, Business, and Society
(Also offered as Chemistry 80G)
Instructors:
E. Suckiel & D. Deamer
Course Description:
The purpose
of this course is to present and analyze ethical and social issues related
to recent and widely influential advances in scientific research and biotechnology.
It is designed to be of interest to students from all disciplines at UCSC.
Guest speakers, distinguished experts in their fields, will join the instructors
to consider the major ethical questions that have arisen from research
in genetics, medicine, and the industries supported by this knowledge.
This includes issues such as the ethics of animal experimentation, the
morality of genetically modified crops, the promise and dangers of the
human genome project, and the appropriate use of medical technologies.
Underlying
our discussions will be an exploration of ways to articulate an appropriate
conception of human beings and their place in the wider environment in
which they live.
Required
Textbook (at Bay Tree Bookstore):
Tom Beauchamp
and LeRoy Walters: Contemporary Issues in Bioethics, 6th edition.
[top
of page]
88A.
Applied Ethics from a Kantian Point of View, 1 credit (Freshman
Discovery Seminar)
TH 2 p.m.4
p.m., Stevenson 230
Call No. 38598
Instructor: J. Tannenbaum
Course Description:
PHIL 88A
is part of a group of courses called Freshman Discovery Seminars. Priority
is given to freshman, but others may enroll if there is space. Students
interested in applied ethics, regardless of their year, might find the
class sufficiently interesting. The course counts toward workload requirements
but not major requirements.
Kantian moral
theory places a special emphasis on respect for rational nature. Traditionally,
respecting rational nature is understood as treating others, or oneself,
not merely as a means but rather as an end. To gain insight into these
important Kantian notions, we will read three papers by leading contemporary
Kantians, namely Onora O'Neill, Thomas Hill, Jr., and Thomas Nagel. In
particular, we will look at the notions of treating others as a mere means
and an end as it is employed in debates about world hunger, affirmative
action, and war.
Reading
list for PHIL 88A:
- O'Neill,
Onora: "The Moral Perplexities of Famine and World Hunger,"
in Matters of Life and Death: New Introductory Essays in Moral Philosophy.
Edited by T. Regan. Random House, 1986.
- Hill,
Thomas: "The Message of Affirmative Action" in Reassessing
Civil Rights, edited by E. Paul and F. Miller and J. Paul. Blackwell,
1991.
- Nagel,
Thomas: "War and Massacre," in Mortal Questions. Cambridge
University Press, 1979.
The class
will meet every other week for two hours. The course is one unit. Students
are required to read the assigned work and come to the class meetings
ready to discuss the reading assignment. These are the only assignments.
The class is taken on a pass/no pass basis.
[top
of page]
91.
Ancient Greek Philosophy
Instructor:
G. Brahm
Course
Description:
This
course will selectively survey the thought of the three best-known figures
in Ancient Greek philosophy: Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. We will consider
some of their views on central issues in ethics, epistemology, and metaphysics,
as those issues are framed in "Analytic Philosophy." Often,
the ancients' concerns are quite familiar, and we should not be shy about
engaging them in light of contemporary philosophical preoccupations. But
we should also remember that in addition to having sharp disagreements
with one another (some of which we will attempt to illuminate), Plato,
Socrates, and Aristotle are products of a very different culture; if we
are to understand them, we must pay close attention to what they actually
say, as opposed to what we might expect them to say. Here, this will involve
repeated close readings of their works in English translation. A central
aim, in addition to doing some philosophy of our own, will be to learn
something about the exegesis of historical texts as practiced in "Analytic"
philosophy departments.
[top
of page]
112.
American Philosophy
Instructor:
E. Suckiel
Course
Description:
A
study of the classical American pragmatists: C.S. Peirce, William James,
and John Deweywith emphasis on their metaphysics, epistemology,
ethics, and philosophy of religion. Special attention will be paid to
issues of religious belief and the justification of faith, particularly,
how these play out in the philosophies of James and Dewey.
[top
of page]
123
/ 224. Philosophy of Language (also
offered as Linguistics 123)
Instructor:
C. O'Callaghan
Course
Description:
"Orange"
is meaningful, "flurg" isn't; "Earth"' refers to something,
"Santa Claus" doesn't; "Lava is hot" is true, "Bears
are bald" isn't. But why? This course will be an advanced introduction
to contemporary issues in the philosophy of language. We will discuss
the work of Frege, Russell, Kripke, Lewis, Putnam, and others in the course
of investigating the natures of reference, meaning, and truth. We will
address questions such as what is it for a sign or a bit of language to
be meaningful, or for it to represent or identify something? What is it
for a statement to be truthful? What makes a bunch of words into a language?
Can you believe Superman flies, but Clark Kent doesn't?
For
more information, including preliminary syllabi for undergraduate and
graduate versions, go to http://people.ucsc.edu/~cjo/teaching/language/language.html
[top
of page]
133
/ 233. Philosophy of Mind
Instructor:
J. Ellis
Course
Description:
This
course will provide an introduction to two central debates in contemporary
philosophy of mind: The Problem of Consciousness and the Externalism-Internalism
Controversy. Conscious experience and neurophysiological activity in the
brain are clearly intimately related, but precisely what is that relation?
Is it one of identity? Causation? Correlation? What are computational
models of mental phenomena, and are they correct? Could two creatures
be physically identical ("molecule for molecule") and yet have
different thoughts? In our travels through the contemporary literature,
we shall meet with such far-away places and strange creatures as Twin
Earth, Inverted Earth, Swampman, superspartans, zombies, bats, brains
in vats, Martians, colorblind scientists, and more.
[top
of page]
140.
History of Ethics
Note:
Draft Syllabus
Winter
2003
Instructor:
Julie Tannenbaum
Office: Cowell A105
Phone: (831) 459-5045
E-mail: tannenba@ucsc.edu
Course Description:
Aristotle
and Immanuel Kant are arguably two of the most influential philosophers
in western philosophy. In this course we will focus on their most famous
ethical works: Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics and Kant's Groundwork
for the Metaphysics of Morals. In particular, we will discuss and
compare each philosopher's view of moral action and moral motivation.
Traditionally, Aristotle and Kant are thought to offer opposing views
of moral action and moral agents. We will closely compare their ethical
views and the arguments for these views in an effort to determine whether
this traditional characterization is accurate.
Anyone taking
this class should already have taken at least one philosophy course
preferably, but not necessarily, a course in ethics.
The goals
of the course are:
- to come
away with an understanding of Aristotle and Kant's ethical theories,
- to develop
some appreciation of the complexity of problems in this area of philosophical
inquiry, and
- to hone
your philosophical skills of argumentation, clear and precise statement,
critical thinking, and effective writing.
More than
likely the assignments will be:
First paper
(20% of total grade)
Second paper (35% of total grade)
Final paper (35% of total grade)
Participation (10% of total grade)
170.
The Interpretation of Religion
Instructor:
R. Goff
Course Description:
Study of
modern and recent philosophical efforts to justify, criticize, and interpret
religious utterance, claim, and practice. Topics will include arguments
in defense of theism, appeals to religious experience, hermeneutic theory
and its uses for religious texts, and problems about generic theories
of religion.
Sources include
Hume, Kant, Feuerbach, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Wittgenstein,
Ricoeur, Levinas, and others.
Two exams,
two papersthe second paper requiring outside reading.
[top
of page]
190J
/ 290J. Humes Ethics
Instructor:
D. Guevara
Course
Description:
A
careful study of any one of the main moral theories in the history of
philosophy, with some emphasis on the relation to contemporary moral philosophy.
This year's topic is Hume's moral philosophy. Enrollment limited to 20.
Enrollment restricted to senior philosophy majors or permission of the
instructor.
[top
of page]
|