![]() |
![]() |
|
| |
|
Spring 2005 Advance Course Information This information effective for Spring 2005. Check with instructor the first day of class for any changes. [HIS-030C] [HIS-133] [HIS-137] [HIS-138] [HIS-182] [HIS-196K] [HIS-196M] [HIS-224] 30C. Europe in the 20th Century Instructor: Bruce Thompson Course information on course website: Note: Draft Syllabus MW 7:00-8:45 p.m. Course Description History 133 is an upper-division lecture course. It offers an overview of the political, military, diplomatic, social, economic, and intellectual developments of 19th- and 20th-century Germany and (to a lesser extent) Austria. Students are expected to attend the lectures, read the books, and pass two written exams. Each exam will cover a distinct period of history; there will be no comprehensive "final" exam. The required books are listed below. They can be purchased at Slug Books, next to the 7-11 Convenience Store and Bay Federal Credit Union near the base of campus. Please note: the reading assignments supplement the lectures (or vice versa, depending on your perspective). In order to do well on the exams, you will have to attend class and read the books. In other words, set aside reading time this quarter, or you might end up regretting that you took this course (well, you may be sorry anyway, given the dismal legacy of the Germans, but that is another story). Required Texts:
137. Modern Jewish Intellectual History Note: Syllabus from a previous quarter Instructor: Bruce Thompson Course Description This course offers a survey of European Jewish intellectual history from the Enlightenment through the first half of the 20th century. Major themes include Jewish mysticism and rationalism, the romance of assimilation, the flowering of Yiddish literature, the origins of Zionism, new understandings of history and of the messianic idea, responses to the Holocaust, and Jewish contributions to the culture of urban modernism. Requirements: one six-page essay (due Monday, April 29) and one ten-page essay (due Friday, May 24), regular attendance. Topics and Readings: 1. Introduction: Children of Spinoza (March 27-29)
2. Mysticism and Messianism (April 1-5)
3. A Fine Romance: Dilemmas of Emancipation and Assimilation (April 8-12)
4. Out of the Shtetl: The Birth of Yiddish Literature (April 15-19)
5. Demons and Dybbuks: From Folklore to Literature (April 22-26)
6. The Angel of History (April 29-May 3)
7. How It Was Done in Odessa: Isaac Babel (May 6-10)
8. Shoah (May 13-24)
9. The Ghost Writer: Singer and His World (May 29-31)
********** History 137. Jewish Intellectual History Suggestions for the First Paper
********** History 137. Jewish Intellectual History Suggestions for the Second Paper
********** Sample of Lecture Notes: Kafka the Kabbalist 1. Kafka In Prague Kafka, as everyone knows, was a doubly marginal figure, as a Jew writing in German in a city where the majority of the populace spoke Czech. Prague Jewry was more remote from Judaism than the Jews of eastern Europe were, or even the Jews of Berlin. The reason: an unusually rapid assimilation in a city where the Jews were the natural allies of the German against the Czechs. Prague was an ancient central European city with an old Jewish quarter, haunted by legends (the story of the golem for example). But it was also a modern capital, seat of a vast and alien (German-speaking) bureaucracy ruling over a downtrodden populace (Czech-speaking) that did not know the meaning of the complicated regulations it had to obey. From these elements Kafka would build up a picture of human anguish in the face of the mysteries of existence that was both dreamlike and concrete, fantastic and real at the same time. The world of Kafka's novels incorporates the maddening impersonality and inscrutability of modern bureaucracy in an image of an insecure medieval community derived from a ghetto Kafka remembered obsessively without ever having lived in it. His heroes are often isolated outsiders, scapegoats. Cut off from community and authority, they often become eavesdroppers, straining to get some sort of purchase on what's being said. What Kafka did was to convert the distinctive quandaries of Jewish existence into images of the existential dilemmas of mankind as such. His stories are repeatedly concerned with questions such as exile, assimilation, endangered community, revelation, commentary, law, tradition, and commandment. In spite of the pervasive atmosphere of menacethere are hostile and inscrutable authorities above, and a generally indifferent but potentially violent crowd of common folk belowthere is a comic note in virtually all of Kafka's work. This too is a legacy of Judaism: the sense of a radical discrepancy between the transcendent Creator and the paltry human creature. It's typical of the Hebrew text of the Bible that its characters are caught in a labyrinth of ambiguous messages. Endless interpretation, interminable analysisthis is an aspect of the Jewish tradition converted by Kafka into a particular kind of modernism. His characters are modern versions of Abraham or Jobalways on trial. The Prague ghetto was abolished in 1850, incorporated with the rest of the inner city under the name of Josefstadt in memory of the liberal benefactor of the Jews, the Austrian Emperor Joseph II. In 1900 there were roughly 450,000 inhabitants of Prague, of whom 35,000 spoke German, and many of these were Jews. Only 8 percent of Prague's population, the German-speaking elite, enjoyed two splendid theaters, a huge concert hall, two universities, two daily newspapers, and an intense social life. But as one of Kafka's contemporaries noted: "In Prague the Germans live in quicksand. The political tension of the last few decades has made coexistence between the Germans and the Czechs an extremely uncomfortable matter, creating a climate of represses violence which limits the spontaneity of bourgeois life." Kafka's grandfather was a kosher butcher in a small Bohemian village. With the official emancipation of the Bohemian Jews after 1848, Jews could move from the country to the city: the case of Prague is parallel to that of Vienna. Kafka's father Hermann (b. 1852) decided to seek his fortune in Prague, where he set up a retail store dealing in haberdashery, parasols, umbrellas, and walking sticks. He gradually expanded it through hard work and an advantageous marriage into one of the major wholesale businesses in the city and surrounding provinces. These were fashionable, decorative goods, part of a developing traffic in commodities appealing to an increasingly affluent bourgeoisieSimmel's world of modern commerce. Kafka followed a typical Jewish pattern: pious village grandfather, successful urban merchant father, professional son. A law degree landed him a job as a clerk in the Workers' Accident Insurance Institute, where he was responsible for interviewing the victims of factory accidents. He knew from the inside the cumbersome bureaucratic apparatus of paper work and hierarchy, indifference and incompetence, that he would satirize in his fiction. He also came to know well the terrible working conditions of the urban proletariat. He began to lead a double lifebureaucrat by day, writer by nightand he described himself as a night-time writer, one whose work is born in the time when we cannot sleep because of feelings of dread. The initial breakthrough into literature seems to have come as a result of the conflict with his philistine father: the vigorous self-made man versus the neurotic and intellectual son. Freud described the pattern in 1908: "Those who succumb to nervous illness are precisely the offspring of fathers who, having been born of rough but vigorous families, living in simple healthy country conditions, had successfully established themselves in the metropolis, and in a short space of time had brought their children to a high level of culture." But Kafka fashioned an unforgettable image of modernity out of his neurosis. 2. Soundless Explosions He developed, quite early, his characteristic stylea stripped-down German that discarded local context. "Prague in his novels is a city without memory. It has even forgotten its name.... Time in Kafka's novels is the time of a humanity that no longer knows anything or remembers anything, that lives in nameless cities with nameless streets" (Milan Kundera). And while the past is vacant, the future is perpetually deferred. Hence the infinite regressions in Kafka, a good example of which is "An Imperial Messenger." The key to this style: matter-of-fact presentation of the surreal. Kafka often renders the everyday event as impossibly difficult; and the impossible, unimaginable phenomenon as an everyday event. The characteristic retardation of time in his fiction fuses banality with menace and suggests the calmness, and clamminess, of a nightmare. There is a pervasive sense of jeopardy in the great labyrinth of arbitrary law, the indifferent officials, the hierarchies above hierarchies, the insufficient papers, the endless wait before a door that never opens. Benign divinity in Kafka's world is replaced by random arbitrations and absent authorities. Kafka's theme: the existentialist anguish of man confronted with the mystery of existenceour inability to know where we have come from and where are going and what obligations we have to fulfill. He's not interested in the burden of guilt carried by the religious believer who has transgressed against known and clearly definable rules, but rather in a consciousness of transgression without any clear knowledge of the rules that have been broken. In the great novels, the characters never know where they stand and are confronted by fundamentally incalculable situations. Despite the reign of a super-bureaucracy, they are not informed of their rights, of their status or assignment, or of the charges against them. And they have a mania for interpretationtypical perhaps of the individual who is marginalized and deprived of power, and on a cultural plane, typical of the Jewish tradition. The stories have an oneiric (dreamlike) characterthey are like dreams in that they invite interpretation but seem to withhold the key. There is only a single point of view: that of the protagonist. The vocabulary is one of inference and conjecture: "apparently"; "maybe." The sentences often consist of two clauses: the first states a fact or a guess; the second qualifies, questions, or negates it. The conjunction "but" is common, and the frequent use of "even if" clauses expresses the tendency to cancel expectations and refute inferences. A lot of this writing is in the subjunctive. This is a world in which nothing ever gets truly resolved, in which any decisive, conclusive event would be incongruous, because no event or series of events could ever suffice to dissolve the enormous burden of doubt, ignorance, and apprehension that Kafka calls up from the first sentence. Very little actually happens in his world; what prolongs narration is not events, but anxious worried reasoning about themthe action consists largely of the formation, elaboration, and abandonment of hypotheses that never quite fit the case. Kafka combines the archaic and the modern: reviving the furies of antiquity, the fatality lurking at the root of human existence, he encloses them within a prosaic framework of litigation, petty worries, and bureaucratic tedium. "Poseidon sat at his desk doing figures. The administration of all the waters gave him endless work." The long tradition of Western individualism is now at the end of the line; the hero is now a victim; and in his conflict with society he has suffered a stunning defeat. Hope is an illusion: "There is an infinite amount of hope, but not for us." Again: "The Messiah will appear only when he is no longer needed, he will arrive the day after his arrival, he will not come on the last of days, but on the day after the last." And: "The hunting dogs are still playing in the courtyard, but the hare will not escape them no matter how fast it may already be flying through the woods." Kafka's usual hero is committed as well as resigned to routine, but the story really begins only with the disruption of routine, and proceeds mostly through attempts to return to routine. "Leopards break into the temple and drink the sacrificial chalices dry: this occurs repeatedly, again and again: finally it can be reckoned upon beforehand and becomes part of the ceremony." Kafka's protagonists attempt to convert disruption itself into an aspect of routine. It's the principle of the "soundless explosion"withholding even a pianissimo where a fortissimo is expected (to use a musical terminology). This anti-sensationalism of tone, this refusal to make an issue of the unusual, confers upon the unusual and even upon the horrible a peculiar kind of intimacy. Kafka makes the strange familiar, the familiar strange. From Kafka's diary: "Anyone who cannot come to terms with his life while he is alive needs one hand to ward off a little his despair over his fatehe has little success in thisbut with his other hand he can note down what he sees among the ruins, for he sees different (and more) things than do the others: after all, dead as he is in his own lifetime, he is the real survivor." 3. Zionist and Kabbalist Walter Sokel, one of the best Kafka scholars, suggests how Kafka's particular family constellation led him to Zionism: "Financial success and prosperity were [for Kafka's parents] substitutes for lost roots and traditions, and compensation for the lack of full civic participation. But Kafka's parents, devoted to their store, had no time for him. Frightened by his father's giant strength and irascible temper, Franz craved, but never received, tenderness and attention from his mother. Starved for love and recognition, the lonely child developed that insatiable hunger for community, for natural warmth, affection, bonds of closeness, that goes a long way toward explaining the overwhelming attraction the Yiddish-speaking community acquired for him. To him his father's residual Jewishness was a parody of religion and a mockery of the kind of community Kafka longed for . All the Jewish figures that were to recall Kafka to Judaism were rebels with the courage to defy their fathers, to break away from stifling surroundings." Robert Alter on Kafka's Kabbalism: "Kafka deeply understood that Judaism was a message-oriented system, and he made the triadic Jewish chain of revelation, law (the message), and interpretation central to his fiction. But in consonance with the more radical currents of the Kabbalah, he was prepared to contemplate the consequences of a 'zero degree' of meaning, a divine 'nothingness' at the heart of revelation. There is something of gnosticism in the metaphysical scheme Kafka frequently assumed: perhaps there is knowledge and a divine source of knowledge, meaningful script and pregnant messages, but these are beyond our access, and in our fallen world we are left with only the gestures of interpretation, perhaps an empty consolation, perhaps the promissory note we cling to for a future when meanings will be given." 138. Women and American Religious Culture Instructor: Marilyn Westerkamp Course Description A historical introduction to the religious culture of the United States as experienced and created by women. This course will explore religious ideas about women, the treatment of women by mainstream institutions and religio/social communities, and female religious leaders and followers. The course takes an explicitly feminist analytical approach and will use a variety of "texts," including historical and literary scholarship, sacred texts, fiction, autobiography, material artifacts, visual arts, and music. When considering women as believers, participants, and leaders, issues frequently ignored by historians of religion come to the fore, including cultural instability, sexuality, deviance, and, of course, power. As people who are frequently disfranchised by institutions and ideological systems (and religion is no exception to this), women are keenly aware of the gendered power dynamics at work. Students should not expect a comprehensive or all-inclusive treatment of the subject(s). Not all communities, leaders, or groups of women will be examined; ten weeks is just too short. Rather, the course will focus upon critical moments and transformative movements as a pathway for exploring the experiences of women in relation to their communities, themselves, and their gods. Readings will be selected from among the following books:
In addition, students will read from primary source documents, including
Students will attend lectures and meet in seminar discussion once per week. Requirements for the course and basis for evaluation include:
Week One Week Two Week Three Week Four Week Five Week Six Week Seven Week Eight Weeks Nine and Ten 182. The Civil War and Reconstruction, 18611877 Note: This course description from Winter 2001 Instructor: Bruce Levine Course Description This course treats the period of civil war and reconstruction as the United States' second revolution. Much about the country's history for the next century and beyond was decided during these decisive years. We will begin by tracing how the decades-long political struggle over slavery during the first half of the 19th century erupted into military conflict in 1861. In the course of studying the war, three related themes will be emphasized: (1) what factors determined the war's outcome, (2) how the methods and goals of both sides changed in the course of the fighting, and (3) how the war altered life in both the North and the South. Although the Confederacy's defeat ended the war, the struggle over the shape of the post-slavery South continued long after Appomattox. In studying this subject, we will focus on the distinct and conflicting ways in which different groups of Americans approached the issues of reconstructing the South and the nation during the war and postwar years. Required Texts
Course Requirements All students are expected to attend all lectures and to complete all
reading and writing assignments on schedule. Attendance and active participation
in section meetings is also mandatory. There will be three two essay-type
exams, each of which will be based upon both readings and lectures. Each
exam will be given as a take-home assignment. 196K. Topics in Medieval History: The Crusades M 5:00-8:00 p.m. For course information, go to the following PDF file: 196M. End of Slavery and Serfdom Note: This course description from Winter 2001 Instructor: Bruce Levine Course Description This course sets the United States' experience with slavery and its elimination in comparative perspective. More specifically, it compares the historical trajectory of slavery in the United States with the rise and decline of this and other forms of bound labor elsewhere in the western hemisphere, Europe, and southern Africa. Class discussion will focus upon readings that address one or another general or locally specific aspect of the international comparison. Among other subjects, we will investigate the origins of and differences
between serfdom and slavery. We will inquire into the relationship between
rights and power in slave societies, on the one hand, and differences
in national origin and race, on the other. We will ask why in some cases
emancipation occurred in a violent and revolutionary manner, but, in others,
occurred peacefully and gradually. We will ask how the experience of emancipation
in one country influenced developments in others. Finally, we will inquire
into the long-term impact that different types of emancipation had on
upon post-emancipation life in different countries. Course Requirements Each student will write one short paper (approximately 5-8 pages) every other week discussing the readings assigned for that week. Students will be graded and/or evaluated on the basis of these essays and their contribution to classroom discussion. Readings will include selections from works such as the following:
224. Social and Cultural History Instructor: Jonathan Beecher Course Description This graduate seminar is mistakenly listed as a Research Seminar. In fact, it will be a Readings Seminar devoted to the reading and discussion of eight or nine works in social and cultural history. Unlike History 205B, which was organized chronologically, this course will be organized thematically and will consider a variety of paradigms and perspectives in social and cultural history. I'm still thinking about the assigned readings, and I would be delighted to discuss possibilities with anyone interested. (I should add that I am, by all means, open to assigning works on non-European history.) At this point, I imagine the course as divided into two halves. In the first half we would read classic 20th-century works suggesting perspectives on history and theory. In the second half we would read recent works in intellectual and cultural history. As of now, the projected reading list looks something like this: Part I: Theoretical Perspectives
Part II: Recent Historical Work
In the case of almost all of the books, we will be reading selections
and not the whole book. Since this is most definitely a course in gestation,
I would be pleased to hear from anyone who is thinking of taking it. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home : Publications and Scheduling : Enrollment : Fees : Transcripts : Special Programs : Graduation |